Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter Hodges's avatar

I just don't see how the preceding paragraphs lead to the penultimate one. I'm not a Sidney scholar, but it seems to me that the whole of Mary Sidney's life of letters up to that point is fascinating and generally accepted with occasional disagreements over print shop gossip. On the other hand, the notion that Mary took the unprecedented step of assuming the pen name of Shakespeare (who later turns up as a real person who apparently decided to assume that name as well) in order to write a riposte to all those back stage Tommy's in the figure of Venus and Adonis, well, that seems a bit of a stretch to me. Especially when the similarity to Hero and Leander is considered. Mary got her name into print well before 1593, so no real reason why she couldn't address the matter in person. I do not accept the notion that stooping to humble Nashe, Daniel, Greville or Florio would have been so beneath her that the Shakespeare ruse was necessary or even useful. I'd like to see some more support of the need for or utility of this disguise if it's available. Similarly, I continue to find a substantial disconnect between the known work of Lady Pembroke and the poem Venus and Adonis. Meanwhile, what have you to say about Harvey's allegation in L'Envoy, the tag to his Gorgon, or That Wonderful Yeare, that "The hugest miracle remains behind / The second Shakerley Rash-Swath to bind"?

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts